|
All Philosophy Is Religion in Disguise
Saint Augustine and John Scotus Eriugena:
St. Augustine says, "A principal point about
man's salvation is the belief and teaching that philosophy or
the pursuit of wisdom is not something other than religion, for
those whose teaching we disapprove of are precisely those who do
not share our faith." I say, What is the practice of
philosophy but the explanation of the precepts of true religion
in which the first and supreme cause of all that exists is
worshipped with humility and investigated by reason? It
ensues from this thought that true philosophy is true religion,
and that true religion is true philosophy. Thus every type
of perfect and holy teaching wherein the rational grounds for
anything is sought most earnestly and found most clearly is that
branch of learning the Greeks call "philosophy" ...
John Scotus Eriugena quoting Augustine and commenting on his
thoughts. From Paul Helm, Faith and Reason,
83-84.
Herman Bavinck:
From every quarter come the demand for a new dogma, a
new religion, a new faith, a new art, a new science, a new school, a new
education, a new social order, a new world, and a new God. The
things offered under this label are too varied, and often also too
silly, to enumerate. Buddhism and Mohammedism and the religion of
Wodan are commended to us, theosophy, occultism, magic and astrology,
demonism and satan-worship, race- and hero-worship, ethical culture and
the pursuit of ideals, the cult of humanity and of Jesus. Reform
movements are the order of the day.
Divergent as these tendencies may be, they
all have two characteristics in common. In the first place,
the principle of autonomy, expressing itself on the one
hand in anarchism of thought, on the other hand in the auto-soterism of
the will. Each individual regards himself as independent and
self-governing, and shapes his own course and pursues his own way.
Having nothing to start with (that is, no first principle - Ed)....
Everybody has his own religion,— not merely every nation and every
church, but every person.... It has become a vogue to study and expound
the religion of Goethe and Lessing, of Kant and Schliermacher, of
Bismarck and Tolstoi.
But in the second place these modern
movements are all alike seeking after religion, after the
supreme good, abiding happiness, true being, absolute worth. Even
though the word "religion" be avoided and the new-fashioned term
"world-view" preferred, in point of fact the satisfaction of no
other need is aimed at than what that which used to be supplied by
religion. As to the proper definition of such a
world-view, there exists considerable divergence of opinion. But
whether with Windelband we define philosophy as the theory of 'the
determination of values,' as the science of 'normal consciousness,' or
conceive of it with Paulsen as a mode of viewing the world and life
'which shall satisfy both the demands of reason and the needs of the
heart,' in any case it is plain that philosophy is not content with a
scientific explanation of reality, but seeks to vindicate the higher
ideals of humanity, to satisfy its deepest needs.
Philosophy wishes itself to serve as religion, and from an attitude of
contempt for all theology has veered round to a profession of being
itself at bottom a search after God." (Herman Bavinck,
The Philosophy of Revelation,
pages 30-32, emphases are Ed's.)
"All philosophy is based upon a non-theoretical,
a priori, religious commitment. The fact is that
all philosophy rests upon a fundamental existential
loyalty (Ed - belief or faith). It is founded on a radical
pre-scientific choice. It has a 'religious' root. No
philosophy maintains a purely theoretical standpoint. All thinking
is based upon assumptions (beliefs) that transcend theoretical thought."
Henry Stob, Theological Reflections,
page
176.
“Philosophy… a word for non-religion, as least traditionally…. an
icon of the mind… more subtle than (idolatrous) worship through images….
The development of ‘philosophy’ … which came about the same time as the
prophetic movement was raised up by God among His people… Buddha …
Confucius … Lao-Tse … Plato and Aristotle.
Virtually from the beginning, philosophy was political
philosophy, designed to support the city of man. Philosophy was the
religion of the state, the new form of the “court prophet” … (rejecting)
personal gods and worship … (debating) what ‘ultimate being was like.
Full-fledged philosophy arrived with Socrates and Plato, who sough to
bring this horrible thinking into the city and persuade the people to
stop worshipping personal spirits and refound their cities on the empty
consolations of philosophy….
The differences between Confucius, Plato, and Buddha should not blind
us to their fundamental sameness…. Lao-Tse, the Plato of China,
advocated an inner contemplation. Plato advocated a new and more
radically anti-God political order, wherein contemplated abstraction
such as the Good would replace the worship of living gods. Buddha took a
more anti-political position, leaving the city to do its business while
advocating a kind of dropping our of society. But this position is still
in the overall context of doing philosophy (religion) in political
terms. Aristotle, heir of Plato, managed to reconcile Plato’s radical
ideas with practical politics, as Confucius, heir of Lao-Tse, did in
China...."
Moreover... the idea (is) that is on a quest for God, a quest for
knowledge about ultimate things. This is exactly the opposite of
Biblical teaching, and in two ways. First, the Bible teaches that
God has clearly revealed Himself and that He speaks in the Bible, so
that there is no need for any quest. Second, sinful man hates God
and is not on a quest for the true God at all, but is rather on a
quest for anything that will block out his innate knowledge of the true
God."
James Jordan,
The Case Against Western Civilization
"Philosophy, the New Religion. A new movement
began around 600 B.C., when some thinkers tried to understand
the world without the help of religion. They were called
philosophers— lovers of wisdom. There had been wisdom teachers
earlier in the ancient world, in Egypt, Babylon, and elsewhere, and the
wisdom literature in Scripture (Proverbs, Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes)
is similar to extra-biblical wisdom literature in many ways. But,
unlike it, the Biblical wisdom teachers declare that "the fear of the
LORD is the beginning of wisdom" (Psalm 111:10; Proverbs 9:10, 15:33;
compare Ecclesiastes 12:13)."
"What distinguishes Greek philosophers from Greek
religious and other ancient wisdom teachers is their insistence on the
supremacy of human reason, what I shall call rational autonomy.
Wisdom teachers in other cultures treasured the traditions of fathers
and mothers, the teachers of past generations... They saw themselves as
collectors and guardians of such tradition, occasionally adding
something and passing on the collection to their sons and daughters.
The philosophers, however, wanted to accept nothing on the basis of
tradition. Although Parmenides and Plato occasionally resorted to
myth, they considered mythological explanations second best and, in the
end, rationally inadequate. Reason must be autonomous,
self-authenticating, and subject to no standards than its own."
"Although the philosophers disagreed on much, they all
agreed that the good life was the life of reason. The them, reason
not the fear of the Lord, was the beginning of wisdom; reason
itself became something of a god— though they did not describe
it as such— an object of ultimate allegiance, and the ultimate standard
of truth and falsity, of right and wrong.... So Greek philosophy was
indeed a "revolution in worldviews." It represented a radical
break from what had gone before."
John M. Frame, Revolutions in Worldview,
pages 5-6.
"Philosophy and religion are identical" was the view of
Saint Augustine. (Clark, Thales to Dewey, page 251)
|